On Tue, 30 Jun 2009 10:02:45 -0400, Jonathan Yu wrote:
> >> How would we represent such a case? Would we need to unpack that
> >> tarball and then reference the files appropriately?
> > Unpacking the tarballs would mean modifying the pristine upstream tar,
> > wouldn't it? I don't think we want to do that.
> That's what we've had to do,
Right, but only temporarily for getting the information.
> But that loses information there. And I don't think that's the way
> we're supposed to do things (in the pkg-perl packages we track each
> license separately).
Maybe we could use "sub-stanzas" like
Files: tarball1.tar.gz
Copyright: xxxx, main author
License: GPL-1 | Artistic
X-Comment: this tarball also contains
Files: foo.pl
Copyright: yyyy, some other guy
License: Apache-2.0
etc. Or whatever creative stuff we can imagine :)
> > And these tarballs contain files with differing copyright holders? Congrats
> > on finding a strange corner case. :)
:)
Cheers,
gregor
--
.''`. http://info.comodo.priv.at/ -- GPG Key IDs: 0x00F3CFE4, 0x8649AA06
: :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, & developer - http://www.debian.org/
`. `' Member of VIBE!AT, SPI Inc., fellow of FSFE | http://got.to/quote/
`- NP: Aimee Mann: Guys Like Me
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature