Re: Sponsorship requirements and copyright files
- To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- Cc: debian-policy@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Sponsorship requirements and copyright files
- From: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <pochu@ubuntu.com>
- Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 01:57:10 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 49E3D156.3070102@ubuntu.com>
- In-reply-to: <871vspqqlt.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu>
- References: <slrngs4ta2.40k.nospam@sshway.ssh.pusling.com> <87iqm5nqoa.fsf@benfinney.id.au> <slrngs5m0j.40k.nospam@sshway.ssh.pusling.com> <1237507095.13789.318.camel@tomoyo> <20090320051959.GE25723@vireo.org> <87fxh8zp1i.fsf@anzu.internal.golden-gryphon.com> <87wsajgefj.fsf@vorlon.ganneff.de> <87eiwqr8ln.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu> <8763i1bwkp.fsf@vorlon.ganneff.de> <871vspqqlt.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu>
Russ Allbery wrote:
> Joerg Jaspert <joerg@debian.org> writes:
>
>> Also, keep in mind what Mark wrote elsewhere. He asked the DPL to let
>> SPI get us some lawyers input on the question. Thats probably the best
>> course.
>
> Yes. I'm wholeheartedly in favor of this, and I think we should hold any
> resolution of this discussion for the results of that.
Has this happened? Did we get a reply yet?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Reply to: