Bug#473439: pick consistent terminology for category/component/area

To: 473439@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#473439: pick consistent terminology for category/component/area
From: Raphael Hertzog <hertzog@debian.org>
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 08:54:01 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20090202075401.GE25583@rivendell>
Reply-to: Raphael Hertzog <hertzog@debian.org>, 473439@bugs.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 87ljsqdnit.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu>
References: <20080330171723.3445.41042.reportbug@undine.alphascorpii.net> <87abkgf4k5.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu> <1206903630.20537.8.camel@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net> <87y780do91.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu> <18418.41500.770214.504233@davenant.relativity.greenend.org.uk> <87y74fubs9.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu> <87k58jj6ta.fsf_-_@windlord.stanford.edu> <20090126234109.GA8939@roeckx.be> <[🔎] 87ljsqdnit.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu>

On Sun, 01 Feb 2009, Russ Allbery wrote:
> True.  I added that because I thought it made the construct clearer, but
> perhaps it doesn't.  I suppose we could use archive area instead, which is
> closer to the wording of the SC.  Does that sound like a better idea?

To me it sounds better but maybe it's only a question of getting used to
the wording.

Cheers,
-- 
Raphaël Hertzog

Le best-seller français mis à jour pour Debian Etch :
http://www.ouaza.com/livre/admin-debian/

Reply to:

References:
- Bug#473439: pick consistent terminology for category/component/area
  - From: Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Processed: user debian-policy@packages.debian.org, setting package to debian-policy, usertagging 509732 ...
Next by Date: Bug#509932: shlibs format only addresses one versioning structure
Previous by thread: Bug#473439: pick consistent terminology for category/component/area
Next by thread: Bug#473439: pick consistent terminology for category/component/area
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread