Re: Relative and absolute symlinks
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 09:57:58AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Do we have consensus that a:
> a) links that do not climb directory trees should be encouraged to be
> relative (do not break case 2)
> b) subdirectories of /var/*/ and /usr/* should be treated as top level
> directories for the purposes of the relative/absolute symlink rule:
> any links that climbs out of /usr/foo/bar or /var/foo/bar should be
> absolute, and the rest of the current rule stays in place?
Fine with me.
--
Lionel
Reply to: