[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#504880: Disambiguate "installed" for packages



On Fri, Nov 07, 2008 at 07:13:18PM +0000, Colin Watson wrote:
> Package: debian-policy
> Version: 3.8.0.1
> Severity: wishlist
> 
> The policy manual currently uses the word "installed" in a couple of
> different ways when referring to packages.

Sometimes it's also using "present" while it probably also means unpacked.  For
instance:
     some packages may
     not be able to rely on their dependencies being present when being
     installed or removed

You also didn't change that installed it seems?

There is also:
          The `Depends' field should also be used if the `postinst',
          `prerm' or `postrm' scripts require the package to be present in
          order to run.  Note, however, that the `postrm' cannot rely on
          any non-essential packages to be present during the `purge'
          phase.


Kurt




Reply to: