[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Processed: Classify new incoming bugs



Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org:

> user debian-policy@packages.debian.org
Setting user to debian-policy@packages.debian.org (was rra@debian.org).
> package debian-policy
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: debian-policy

> severity 458910 minor
Bug#458910: debian-policy: Policy and dpkg disagree on debian revision tests.
Severity set to `minor' from `normal'

> usertag 458910 = normative issue
Bug#458910: debian-policy: Policy and dpkg disagree on debian revision tests.
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: normative issue.
> retitle 458910 Policy and dpkg disagree on sorting of a -0 Debian revision
Bug#458910: debian-policy: Policy and dpkg disagree on debian revision tests.
Changed Bug title to `Policy and dpkg disagree on sorting of a -0 Debian revision' from `debian-policy: Policy and dpkg disagree on debian revision tests.'.

> merge 458910 186700
Bug#186700: Sorting and meaning of an empty Debian revision is unclear
Bug#458910: Policy and dpkg disagree on sorting of a -0 Debian revision
Merged 186700 458910.

> severity 459427 wishlist
Bug#459427: changelog vs. NEWS handling
Severity set to `wishlist' from `normal'

> usertag 459427 = normative issue
Bug#459427: changelog vs. NEWS handling
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: normative issue.
> severity 459868 wishlist
Bug#459868: debian-policy: Definition of Maintainer: when using a mailing list
Severity set to `wishlist' from `normal'

> usertag 459868 = normative proposal
Bug#459868: debian-policy: Definition of Maintainer: when using a mailing list
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: proposal normative.
> severity 462589 minor
Bug#462589: Description doesn't make sense (and dpkg no longer generates it) for source-only *.changes files
Severity set to `minor' from `normal'

> usertag 462589 = normative issue
Bug#462589: Description doesn't make sense (and dpkg no longer generates it) for source-only *.changes files
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: normative issue.
> severity 462996 wishlist
Bug#462996: Document requirements for copyright file.
Severity set to `wishlist' from `normal'

> usertag 462996 = normative discussion
Bug#462996: Document requirements for copyright file.
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: normative discussion.
> severity 465140 wishlist
Bug#465140: debian-policy: clarify when to use alternatives
Severity set to `wishlist' from `normal'

> usertag 465140 = normative discussion
Bug#465140: debian-policy: clarify when to use alternatives
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: normative discussion.
> retitle 465140 Clarify when alternatives may be used
Bug#465140: debian-policy: clarify when to use alternatives
Changed Bug title to `Clarify when alternatives may be used' from `debian-policy: clarify when to use alternatives'.

> severity 470633 wishlist
Bug#470633: debian-policy: removal of old conffile should be allowed
Severity set to `wishlist' from `normal'

> usertag 470633 = informative proposal
Bug#470633: debian-policy: removal of old conffile should be allowed
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: informative proposal.
> retitle 470633 Explicitly say obsolete configuration files may be removed
Bug#470633: debian-policy: removal of old conffile should be allowed
Changed Bug title to `Explicitly say obsolete configuration files may be removed' from `debian-policy: removal of old conffile should be allowed'.

> severity 470994 wishlist
Bug#470994: mail_spool default mode is 0660
Severity set to `wishlist' from `normal'

> usertag 470994 = normative issue
Bug#470994: mail_spool default mode is 0660
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: normative issue.
> retitle 470994 Mail spool files should be mode 0600
Bug#470994: mail_spool default mode is 0660
Changed Bug title to `Mail spool files should be mode 0600' from `mail_spool default mode is 0660'.

> usertag 71621 = normative discussion
Bug#71621: No policy on calling update-alternatives (was Re: update-alternatives)
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: normative discussion.
> retitle 71621 Standardize when update-alternatives --remove may be called
Bug#71621: No policy on calling update-alternatives (was Re: update-alternatives)
Changed Bug title to `Standardize when update-alternatives --remove may be called' from `No policy on calling update-alternatives (was Re: update-alternatives)'.

> unmerge 112828
Bug#112828: Example for using update-alternatives in package maintainer scripts
Bug#71621: Standardize when update-alternatives --remove may be called
Disconnected #112828 from all other report(s).

> close 112828
Bug#112828: Example for using update-alternatives in package maintainer scripts
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug closed, send any further explanations to racke@linuxia.de (Stefan Hornburg (Racke))

> usertag 458385 = normative proposal
Bug#458385: New version of Artistic License
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: proposal normative.
> retitle 458385 Include Artistic 2.0 in common-licenses
Bug#458385: New version of Artistic License
Changed Bug title to `Include Artistic 2.0 in common-licenses' from `New version of Artistic License'.

> usertag 458824 = normative discussion
Bug#458824: better specification for when rpath is permitted is needed
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: normative discussion.
> retitle 458824 Specify when and to what RPATH may be set in a binary or library
Bug#458824: better specification for when rpath is permitted is needed
Changed Bug title to `Specify when and to what RPATH may be set in a binary or library' from `better specification for when rpath is permitted is needed'.

> usertag 466550 = normative discussion
Bug#466550: Please clarify the get-orig-source target stated in Policy 4.9
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: normative discussion.
> retitle 466550 Clarify or remove the get-orig-source target specification
Bug#466550: Please clarify the get-orig-source target stated in Policy 4.9
Changed Bug title to `Clarify or remove the get-orig-source target specification' from `Please clarify the get-orig-source target stated in Policy 4.9'.

> package debian-policy,python-defaults
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: debian-policy,python-defaults

> usertag 462377 = normative discussion
Bug#462377: python-defaults: The de facto Python policy should be blessed "official"
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: normative discussion.
> --
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


Reply to: