Bug#367984: clarify handling of run-time and compile-time support programs
On Tue, 01 Jan 2008, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Here's a patch that I think resolves this and is more explicit about the
> problems and the suggested solutions.
>
> Comments? Seconds?
Looks good except:
> + This package might typically be named
> + <package><var>libraryname</var>-runtime</package>; note the
> + absence of the <var>soversion</var> in the package name.
We have more lib.*-tools (22) than lib.*-runtime (15). I wonder if we
shouldn't rather recommend *-tools... it's probably more explicit to the
end user too. On the other hand, it might create undue expectations.
That said: seconded whatever naming you choose.
Cheers,
--
Raphaël Hertzog
Le best-seller français mis à jour pour Debian Etch :
http://www.ouaza.com/livre/admin-debian/
Reply to: