Bug#430649: Bug#209008: New proposed wording for DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS
On Mon, Dec 31, 2007 at 12:34:55PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Robert Millan <rmh@aybabtu.com> writes:
>
> > I thought the number of affected packages would be small. Can you point
> > me to that analisys ?
>
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2007/12/msg00020.html
>
> 204 built BROKEN packages
> 1408 FAILED
> 230 FAILED, even with regular build
> 8986 succeeded
> 1014 succeeded, but with jobserver warnings
Thanks for the pointer. Although that analisys was done with -j3 instead of
-j2. I wonder if it'd make a difference.
--
Robert Millan
<GPLv2> I know my rights; I want my phone call!
<DRM> What use is a phone call, if you are unable to speak?
(as seen on /.)
Reply to: