On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 01:03:01PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: > In the interest of getting *something* into Policy, even if it doesn't > give us everything that we want, I'm inclined to accept Colin's suggestion > and exempt cases where upstream intends the code to be embedded and not > used as a separate library. It means that Policy won't be helping with a > few of our annoying cases, but at least we say something about the general > case and the specific cases can still be dealt with on a case-by-case > basis the way that we do now. > Agreed (and hence the 'should' not must' :P), and thus I second this. Neil -- <tore> Jump in and have a quim!
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature