Re: Proposalto introduce compiler options passed from dpkg-buildpackage
Loïc Minier <lool@dooz.org> writes:
> On Thu, Dec 06, 2007, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> b) does not represent current practice
>> c) not implementing the proposal is not a technical hindrance to any
>> package
> This is the same point. Just for the record, there's a small set of
> packages not based on a Makefile for debian/rules.
To be precise, there's one package that doesn't use a makefile and a set
of around 14 that use a shell script wrapper around make. (I'm fairly
sure that what the latter set are doing could be done with an included
makefile, but I haven't checked to be sure.)
--
Russ Allbery (rra@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
Reply to: