Bug#420701: GFDL is now in common-licenses

["Giacomo A. Catenazzi" <cate@debian.org>]

Russ Allbery wrote:
> Here is a proposed wording patch.  Unless there are any objections, I'll
> commit this to my repository.
>
> --- orig/policy.sgml
> +++ mod/policy.sgml
> @@ -8653,8 +8653,8 @@
>  
>  	<p>
>  	  Packages distributed under the UCB BSD license, the Artistic
> -	  license, the GNU GPL, and the GNU LGPL, should refer to the
> -	  corresponding files under
> +	  license, the GNU GPL, the GNU LGPL, and the GNU FDL should refer
> +	  to the corresponding files under
>  	  <file>/usr/share/common-licenses</file>,<footnote>
>              <p>
>                For example,

> @@ -8665,9 +8665,7 @@
>                <file>/usr/share/common-licenses/GFDL</file>,
>                <file>/usr/share/common-licenses/GPL-2</file>, and
>                <file>/usr/share/common-licenses/LGPL-2.1</file>, and so
> -              on. Note that the GFDL is new here, and the license file
> -              may not yet be in place in
> -              <file>/usr/share/common-licenses/GFDL</file>. 
> +              on.
>              </p>
>            </footnote> rather than quoting them in the copyright
>  	  file. 

I think we should add also the license version in the first paragraph,
as is stated in the second part, not to confuse users.

+	  license, the GNU GPL (v. 2), the GNU LGPL (v. 2 and v. 2.1), and the 
GNU FDL should refer
+	  to the corresponding files under

ciao
	cate