[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#422552: Minor typos and wording suggestions



Package: debian-policy
Version: 3.7.2.2
Severity: minor

Hi!

While reading the Debian policy I found some minor things I'd like to see
improved. I'm refering to the PDF dated 2006-10-02, so page numbers might be
slightly inaccurate, please bear with me.

- Page 8, 2.5 Priorities, Paragraph on "required": s/Removing an required/Removing a required/

- Page 9, 2.5 Priorities, Paragraph on "extra": This is not too nice read, I'd
  suggest the following wording:
  extra For one, this contains all packages that conflict with others of priority
  required, important, standard or optional. Furthermore it is used for packages
  that are only likely to be useful if you already know what they are or
  packages that have specialized requirements.

- Page 39, 6.1, second paragraph: ... and must not be not world-writable; either
  this is a major error as it means that the files _must be_ world-writable, or
  it should be reworded to must be world-writable. Then it would deserve some
  explanation because usually one would never want world-writable scripts.

- Page 39, 6.1, third paragraph, first line: ... exit status from these scripts.
  ...  should read ... exit status of these scripts. ...

- Page 39, 6.1, fourth paragraph: ... (this is usually true when writing shell
  scripts, in fact). - This is the Debian policy, I think this is not the point
  for giving general advice (or even opinions of the authors, even though I do
  agree here). Rather, the reader should be referred to 10.4, Scripts, where
  this is discussed appropriately.

- Page 40, 6.1, first paragraph of page 40: ... These considerations really
  apply to all shell scripts. - Again, this is the Debian policy, not the point
  for general advice, refer to 10.4.

- Page 40, 6.2, heading: Maintainer scripts Idempotency - idempotency should be
  lowercase here.

- Page 40, 6.3: ... redirected into a pipe for ... ; this should be ... redirected
  to a pipe for ...

- Page 40, 64: ... system looks for the exit status ... ; this should be ...
  system looks at the exit status ...

- Page 41, 6.6, 1, 2: ... If this does not work, the error unwind: -- so - what,
  there seems to be some part of the sentence missing.


Ok, finally, that's it for now. If some of my points are valid, minor may not be
an appropriate severity anymore...

Best regards,
Michael


Attachment: pgpzG9NQAkWpL.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: