Bug#430649: Bug#209008: New proposed wording for DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS

[Robert Millan <rmh@aybabtu.com>]

On Mon, Dec 31, 2007 at 12:34:55PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Robert Millan <rmh@aybabtu.com> writes:
> 
> > I thought the number of affected packages would be small.  Can you point
> > me to that analisys ?
> 
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2007/12/msg00020.html
> 
>     204 built BROKEN packages
>    1408 FAILED
>     230 FAILED, even with regular build
>    8986 succeeded
>    1014 succeeded, but with jobserver warnings

Thanks for the pointer.  Although that analisys was done with -j3 instead of
-j2.  I wonder if it'd make a difference.

-- 
Robert Millan

<GPLv2> I know my rights; I want my phone call!
<DRM> What use is a phone call, if you are unable to speak?
(as seen on /.)