[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#456289: marked as done (debian-policy: authoritative list of virtual package names is not up-to-date)



Your message dated Fri, 14 Dec 2007 18:23:52 +0100
with message-id <20071214172352.GA3166@roeckx.be>
and subject line Bug#456289: debian-policy: authoritative list of virtual package names is not up-to-date
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: debian-policy
Version: 3.7.2.2
Severity: important

The authoritative list of virtual package 
names is from September 2002 but here
http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/virtual-package-names-list.txt
is a newer one from December 2007.
Please update.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-4-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

-- no debconf information



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 3.7.3.0

The website contains the list from 3.7.3.0.  The version in 
3.7.2.2 says "September 2002" at the top, but at the bottom
it has a changelog going to October 2006.

On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 11:49:11AM +0100, Werner Heuser wrote:
> Package: debian-policy
> Version: 3.7.2.2
> Severity: important
> 
> The authoritative list of virtual package 
> names is from September 2002 but here
> http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/virtual-package-names-list.txt
> is a newer one from December 2007.
> Please update.


Kurt



--- End Message ---

Reply to: