Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy
* Thomas Bushnell BSG (tb@becket.net) [061117 00:48]:
> On Thu, 2006-11-16 at 20:51 +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > > I can live with a list of features. But then, geez, don't you think the
> > > actual list should be given? Saying "works on a Posix compatible shell"
> > > restricts way too much (you can't use "debconf" then) unless we wink and
> >
> > Could you just stop spreading this debconf example, it's utterly wrong.
>
> Are you saying that Posix.2 limits what things a shell can make a
> builtin? Can you provide a reference?
Totally irrelevant to the section we're discussing. But that has been
told you before, and you continue to ignore it.
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
Reply to: