Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy
Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org> writes:
> Otavio Salvador <otavio@debian.org> writes:
>> Holger Levsen <debian@layer-acht.org> writes:
>>> On Monday 06 November 2006 18:07, Russ Allbery wrote:
>>>> + required under POSIX, hence this explicit addition. Also,
>>>> + rumour has it that this shall be mandated under the LSB
>>>> + anyway.
>>>
>>> I dont think the debian policy should spread rumours about the LSB. Either
>>> state facts from the LSB or don't mention it.
>
>> I agree with you Holger.
>
>> That could be removed from the patch and then I think the patch is OK,
>> form my POV.
>
> Note that this language is already present in Policy and only shows up as
> changed in my patch due to rewrapping.
>
> I don't object to removing it, though.
But as Holger stated, doesn't make sense to spread a rumours on the
Debian Policy. I think would be good to remove it from the
patch. Anyone objects?
--
O T A V I O S A L V A D O R
---------------------------------------------
E-mail: otavio@debian.org UIN: 5906116
GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: 49A5F855
Home Page: http://www.freedom.ind.br/otavio
---------------------------------------------
"Microsoft gives you Windows ... Linux gives
you the whole house."
Reply to: