Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy (was: First draft of review of policy must usage)

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-policy@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy (was: First draft of review of policy must usage)
From: Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 12:27:59 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20061106112759.GW2926@mails.so.argh.org>
Mail-followup-to: Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>, debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-policy@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 87velttf63.fsf_-_@windlord.stanford.edu>
References: <87y7r59bkw.fsf@glaurung.internal.golden-gryphon.com> <20061025180132.GA10298@roeckx.be> <878xj46xk0.fsf@glaurung.internal.golden-gryphon.com> <87lkn09pqt.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu> <[🔎] 87velttf63.fsf_-_@windlord.stanford.edu>

* Russ Allbery (rra@debian.org) [061106 04:41]:
> Here's a proposed patch.  What do people think about this approach? 

Sounds good, thanks for your work.


Cheers,
Andi
-- 
  http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/

Reply to:

References:
- Proposed new POSIX sh policy (was: First draft of review of policy must usage)
  - From: Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy (was: First draft of review of policy must usage)
Next by Date: Re: Please review Policy change for ~ in versions
Previous by thread: Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy (was: First draft of review of policy must usage)
Next by thread: Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy (was: First draft of review of policy must usage)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread