Re: First draft of review of policy must usage

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-policy@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: First draft of review of policy must usage
From: md@Linux.IT (Marco d'Itri)
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 14:07:58 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20061026120758.GB6044@wonderland.linux.it>
Mail-followup-to: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-policy@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 1161851461.31085.20.camel@silicium.ccc.cea.fr>
References: <[🔎] 87y7r59bkw.fsf@glaurung.internal.golden-gryphon.com> <[🔎] 1161851461.31085.20.camel@silicium.ccc.cea.fr>

On Oct 26, Josselin Mouette <joss@debian.org> wrote:

> FWIW, I strongly disagree with these changes. The solution is to bring
> the release policy in line with the real policy, not the opposite.
Yes, and let's forget about this "reality" bullshit...

-- 
ciao,
Marco

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to:

References:
- First draft of review of policy must usage
  - From: Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org>
- Re: First draft of review of policy must usage
  - From: Josselin Mouette <joss@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: First draft of review of policy must usage
Next by Date: Re: Proposal to delay the decition of the DPL of the withdrawal of the Package Policy Committee delegation
Previous by thread: Re: First draft of review of policy must usage
Next by thread: Re: First draft of review of policy must usage
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread