On Thu, 2006-10-26 at 03:07 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: > What's the importance of Debian Policy if RM team can do whatever they > want? How we can ensure that Debian has the minimal quality when it's > get release? the change would make it reflect the fact that this is already the reality--that yes packages that do not comply with policy are allowed in a stable release etc. we then put a certain level of trust in the RM's that they won't abuse this (we are already doing this too). this way, when a package maintainer doesn't have the RM's to back them up (any other time than when preparing for a stable release), bugs can keep their priority/severity where they ought to be. ideally the list of exceptions could be published somewhere as an addendum/errata for a stable release. i'm just nervous that the other s/MUST/ought to/ type compromises in policy will have a much worse effect. sean
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part