Policy process (was: [Pkg-sysvinit-devel] Re: Moving /var/run to a tmpfs?)
- To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-policy@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Policy process (was: [Pkg-sysvinit-devel] Re: Moving /var/run to a tmpfs?)
- From: Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org>
- Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 11:43:18 -0700
- Message-id: <[🔎] 87k6428hbt.fsf_-_@windlord.stanford.edu>
- In-reply-to: <20060917174258.GA5404@roeckx.be> (Kurt Roeckx's message of "Sun, 17 Sep 2006 19:42:58 +0200")
- References: <20060916165405.GA3115@downhill.g.la> <20060916181329.GA592@roeckx.be> <20060916193807.GQ18073@saruman.uio.no> <eej44i$erj$1@sea.gmane.org> <20060917093417.GU18073@saruman.uio.no> <87d59ua0vh.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu> <20060917174258.GA5404@roeckx.be>
Copying the debian-policy list, since this conversation is basically about
that.
Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> writes:
> I don't think policy changes need to be seconded. We have a policy team
> that should decide on what comes in policy and what not. Although, it
> more looks like it's just 1 person doing all the work.
> I sometimes feel that they go to slow which changing things, and I'm not
> really sure it's a good or bad thing.
> Some of those currently open bugs against the policy package, like your
> ~ in version numbers, really shouldn't be a problem to get into the
> policy. I don't think anybody has a problem with it. I think it's just
> that no new version of the policy has been made yet.
Well, policy-process is still shipped with the debian-policy package, and
my experience in the past is that when I follow that process, the changes
go into Policy fairly quickly. Certainly seconding would show that
someone reviewed the wording of my proposed ~ patch and has confirmed that
it sounds like an accurate and implementable description of their
behavior.
Maybe Manoj could weigh in on how he sees the current process?
--
Russ Allbery (rra@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
Reply to: