Bug#367697: clarify 12.3 Additional documentation
On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 08:56:41PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> The underlying question here was really, "Should PDF documentation be
> installed compressed?" (Or PostScript or OpenOffice etc. in place of
> PDF.) The policy is not worded precisely enough on that subject.
> Obviously, you don't want to install HTML compressed.
Actually, I do. I run apache on my laptop anyway, since I need it for
other things. Doing 'firefox http://localhost/doc/' instead of trying to
read files in /usr/share/doc directly makes for a transparent way of not
having to deal with the .gz stuff; and the reduced space usage because
of the .html files being compressed is nice.
--
Fun will now commence
-- Seven Of Nine, "Ashes to Ashes", stardate 53679.4
Reply to: