On 10690 March 1977, Manoj Srivastava wrote: >> How about including more licenses in the list in 12.5 (and at the >> same time adding them to base-files). > How many packages are there under this license? I have no numbers. I just proposed those two licenses because I see them often in NEW. Well, often enough to write this mail. >> Good candidates, IMO, are: The python license, the ZPL, the ruby >> license. > Looking at my own machine, I can't assert that the license yet > meets that criteria. So we should look at the whole archive. Hrm, doing that later. > There is a tradeoff involved in not having the copyright file > included in a package; and the savings are not having multiple copies > of the same file over and over again. Sure. -- bye Joerg <Christian> bignachos: the famous pornview maintainer? <HoserHead> Christian: *don't* ask why he's typing so slowly <bignachos> hey, at least i thoroughly test my packages
Attachment:
pgpIvxDZkC1G8.pgp
Description: PGP signature