Bug#374029: Fixing inconsisten and unusefull Build-Depends/Conflicts definition
One question to ask is perhaps whether splitting the build dependencies
into several sets is useful at all, considering that the current state
of having effectively only one useful set has persistent for such a
long time.
Not a lot of people really understand the current definition, and this
proposal introduces even more ways of getting things wrong. Not a lot
of people practice local architecture-only rebuilds or some of the
other corner cases that would be induced by this proposal. I'm afraid
that this will just introduce more hard-to-detect bugs, and all the
upload and rebuild time caused thereby will probably outweigh the
download time saved by the buildds.
Reply to: