[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#363486: dpkg: [update-alternatives] New categories for: WORD, EXCEL, MEDIA-PLAYER etc.



| Guillem Jover <guillem@debian.org>:
| reassign 363486 debian-policy
| 
| each package should agree on which interface is needed to be able to
| provide a specific alternative. And if they should provide a virtual
| package for it.
| 
| On Wed, 2006-04-19 at 14:44:08 +0300, Jari Aalto wrote:
| > Package: dpkg
| > Version: 1.13.18
| > Severity: wishlist
| > 
| > There are many programs that act on a file that contains certain extension
| > or if they support MIME types, they look up the program associated with it.
| > 
| > The problem is that there are many programs to do the same thing. For example
| > Person trying to open "File Manager" must remmeber that the
| > esoteric names are
| > 
| > 	xfe
| > 	mfm
| > 	emelfm
| > 	worker
| > 	krusader
| > 	endeavour2
| > 	rox-filer
| > 	thunar 
| > 	...
| > 
| > The same problem is with Office programs:
| > 
| > 	lyx
| > 	abiword
| > 	oowriter
| > 	...
| > 
| > The /etc/alternatives contains a good framework to canonicalize actions to
| > common names available in system and to control the preferred program.
| > 
| > SUGGESTION
| > 
| > Create new alternatives with names something like:
| > 
| > 	x-office-word
| > 	x-office-excel		
| > 	x-file-manager
| > 	x-archiver		
| > 	x-media-player		or "video-player"
| > 	x-music-player		For music
| > 
| > This way numerous programs could refer to common program "music-player",
| > which the arternatives frame work would provide. The generic names would
| > also add simplicity to overall handling of the various binaries that
| > would hook themselves to the alternatives base.
| > 
| > Small window managers (Other than the KDE, Gnome, Xfce) would also
| > benefit from this, because they could use generic menu items and call
| > the "alternatives" name without the need to refer to certain binary,
| > which may not be installed.

To Debian Policy ML:

Is there any coordinated effort to standardize the name of the provided
programs in /etc/alternatives? 

I revised the above proposal by adding prefix:

  x-*

for programs requiring an X environment.

Jari



Reply to: