clone 189422 -1 reassign 189422 texinfo severity 189422 serious submitter -1 joy@srce.hr # Feel free to "block 189422 with -1", # but the original bug is still severity serious. thanks, control, and have a nice day I would appreciate if you are going to change the topic of a bug, that you clone it and mark the submitter as yourself. I disagree with the current title of the bug, because: 0. If the copyright file can be neither compressed nor a symbolic link, then what makes info files special? 1. To be on par with the copyright file, the info files would have to be uncompressed, which would be a violation of another section of Debian Policy. 2. It will lead to exceptions where we will not have all the copyright information in one place, which is detrimental to users, developers, and DDs. AIUI, the copyright file is so that we have exactly that information. Imagine my surprise when I looked at the bugs I had submitted and found that I claimed we should "allow pointers to info docs for licenses like GFDL that apply to them", when I didn't remember espousing that position at all. In future, please clone bugs where the bug in question is not actually in some other package (it is not here) or when the proposed solution implies a change with which the original submitter may not agree (a simple email would have told you that).
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part