[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#325234: debian-policy: mention if coincidence runlevels 2345 all same



On Monday 29 August 2005 02:42, Brendan O'Dea wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 27, 2005 at 04:09:46AM +0800, Dan Jacobson wrote:
> Debian doesn't enforce a policy on the multi-user run-levels (2-5), this
> is the decision of the local administrator.

I agree that not enforcing a policy on run-levels is fine, the admin should 
always be able to change them as he see fits.

but is there really any good reason to have the default run-level states 
differ from the LSB defined init-level states [1]? 

[1] 
http://refspecs.freestandards.org/LSB_3.0.0/LSB-Core-generic/LSB-Core-generic/runlevels.html
-- 
Cheers, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis)
  
1. Encrypted mail preferred (GPG KeyID: 0x86624ABB)
2. Plain-text mail recommended since I move html and double
    format mails to a low priority folder (they're mainly spam)

Attachment: pgp4eb5nUvFbe.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: