[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#250202: Alternate proposal



On Jun 12, Wouter Verhelst <wouter@debian.org> wrote:

> <20050426093217.GN4948@country.grep.be> to say the target should be
> "patched", rather than "source". For reference, the proposal as it now
> reads follows; as always, I'm looking for seconds.
I object. If the standard "patched" target exists then README.source
should not be needed.

-- 
ciao,
Marco

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: