Bug#291148: 'status' option should be required of init.d scripts

To: 291148@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#291148: 'status' option should be required of init.d scripts
From: Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org (va, manoj)>
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 19:49:10 -0500
Message-id: <[🔎] 87is08356h.fsf@glaurung.internal.golden-gryphon.com>
Reply-to: Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org (va, manoj)>, 291148@bugs.debian.org
In-reply-to: <20050531153801.D4C023CC00E@tigger.sf.gildea.net> (Stephen Gildea's message of "Tue, 31 May 2005 08:38:01 -0700")
References: <20050531153801.D4C023CC00E@tigger.sf.gildea.net>

Hi,

        This seems like a reasonable suggestion, especially if it is
 compatible with LSB strictures. Are there any objections to allowing
 policy to mention an optional status command for initscripts?

        I am seconding this proposal. Any others?

        manoj
-- 
perfect guest: One who makes his host feel at home.
Manoj Srivastava   <srivasta@debian.org>  <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B  924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C

Attachment: pgpYjC62vkT5F.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to:

Prev by Date: Bug#314808: /usr/share/PACKAGE/www
Next by Date: Bug#314808: Incorrect directory for web applications.
Previous by thread: and began scooting
Next by thread: and then gave
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread