Bug#314808: /usr/share/PACKAGE/www
On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 01:05:41AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> You can suggest it, but top-level directories are governed by the FHS, and
> you'll have to come up with a pretty strong reason why the existing
> available directories don't address the need.
So FHS suggests:
http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html#SRVDATAFORSERVICESPROVIDEDBYSYSTEM
There is no consensus. It's a mess.
> There's no way that Debian is going to create /web/example.com for you, and
Why not? Because of FHS?
> webapp packages certainly aren't going to populate that directory with their
> files on install, so what does it actually buy anyone to put this in policy?
Why not? Web apps should be be configured to do so. Just like they would
have to be for PACKAGE/www type structure.
Reply to: