Re: Bug#250202: Alternate proposal
On Sun, Jun 12, 2005 at 01:18:42PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Jun 12, Wouter Verhelst <wouter@debian.org> wrote:
>
> > <20050426093217.GN4948@country.grep.be> to say the target should be
> > "patched", rather than "source". For reference, the proposal as it now
> > reads follows; as always, I'm looking for seconds.
> I object. If the standard "patched" target exists then README.source
> should not be needed.
The intention for debian/README.source was to document all
out-of-the-ordinary things, not just what is now covered by debian/rules
patched. In fact, debian/rules patched should /not/ be documented there.
If that isn't clear enough, this might need some clarification; in
addition, we could use it to its own section.
--
The amount of time between slipping on the peel and landing on the
pavement is precisely one bananosecond
Reply to: