Re: libxine1 creates /u/s/d/xine/

[Joerg Sommer <joerg@alea.gnuu.de>]

Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@debian.org> wrote:
> On Sun, 03 Apr 2005, Bill Allombert wrote:
>> For the record:
>> $ dpkg -L libxine1|grep /usr/share/doc
>> /usr/share/doc/xine
> [...]
>> Given the binary package 'xine' does not exist currently, I think this
>> is a policy violation due to namespace breakage.
>
> Agreed.  The directory would have to be named at least XINE or Xine to avoid
> such problems (in which case I don't think it violates policy, or at least
> not its spirit).
>
> That said, it is much better to have it all under libxine1.

What is with /usr/share/doc/texmf? Is this legal?

$ pkgof /usr/share/doc/texmf/
tetex-base  tetex-bin  foiltex  tetex-doc

Jörg.

-- 
$ cat /dev/random
#!/usr/bin/perl -WT
print "hello world\n";