Re: libxine1 creates /u/s/d/xine/
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On Sun, 03 Apr 2005, Bill Allombert wrote:
>> For the record:
>> $ dpkg -L libxine1|grep /usr/share/doc
>> Given the binary package 'xine' does not exist currently, I think this
>> is a policy violation due to namespace breakage.
> Agreed. The directory would have to be named at least XINE or Xine to avoid
> such problems (in which case I don't think it violates policy, or at least
> not its spirit).
> That said, it is much better to have it all under libxine1.
What is with /usr/share/doc/texmf? Is this legal?
$ pkgof /usr/share/doc/texmf/
tetex-base tetex-bin foiltex tetex-doc
$ cat /dev/random
print "hello world\n";