Bug#250202: Alternate proposal
On Tue, Apr 26, 2005 at 11:32:17AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> I'm hereby rescinding all previous proposals I made on #250202, to
> replace them with the following:
> --- policy.sgml.orig 2005-04-26 11:02:02.000000000 +0200
> +++ policy.sgml 2005-04-26 11:28:10.000000000 +0200
> I think this wording is discouraging enough towards using tarballs in
> source packages, while OTOH still allowing it *and* requesting people to
> document anything out of the ordinary. I think this is a compromise that
> includes all viewpoints, but I'm of course open to other suggestions.
> I'm looking for seconds.
(Do we really need to sign seconds to policy proposals? If you do
insist, I will, but I prefer not to need to go through the hassle)
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
Jeroen@wolffelaar.nl (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944357)