[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Policy for devfs support

On Apr 23, Russell Coker <russell@coker.com.au> wrote:

> Every package has certain expectations about device node names.  Since devfs 
> is now considered as a bad idea the naming scheme should be as well.
No, it should not.
Almost every package supports it and there is no reason to remove the


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: