Processed: rejecting old proposal

To: Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org (va, manoj)>
Cc: Debian Policy List <debian-policy@lists.debian.org>(debian-policy #224509)
Subject: Processed: rejecting old proposal
From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System)
Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 19:33:17 -0800
Message-id: <[🔎] handler.s.C.110757411318698.transcript@bugs.debian.org>
In-reply-to: <87brazitg4.fsf@glaurung.internal.golden-gryphon.com>
References: <87brazitg4.fsf@glaurung.internal.golden-gryphon.com>

Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org:

> retitle 224509 [REJECTED 2005/02/04] Correct spurious promise regarding TTY availability
Bug#224509: [PROPOSAL] Correct spurious promise regarding TTY availability
Changed Bug title.

> tags 224509 +fixed
Bug#224509: [REJECTED 2005/02/04] Correct spurious promise regarding TTY availability
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed

> --
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Reply to:

Prev by Date: Bug#240665: marked as done ([PROPOSAL] require depending on split-off packages)
Next by Date: Bug#225465: marked as done (debian-policy: packages must give choice to not start at boot, via debconf)
Previous by thread: Bug#240665: marked as done ([PROPOSAL] require depending on split-off packages)
Next by thread: Bug#225465: marked as done (debian-policy: packages must give choice to not start at boot, via debconf)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread