Bug#267142: debian-policy: Sections 10.4 and 6.1 are inconsistent (Posix doesn't say what you think it says)
On Sat, Aug 21, 2004 at 01:02:18AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Wouter Verhelst <wouter@grep.be> writes:
>
> > On Fri, Aug 20, 2004 at 05:16:35PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> > > By contrast, listing a bunch of shells directly means that policy
> > > doesn't have to get into the nitty gritty--which can only be a good
> > > thing!
> >
> > Sorry; but I find a list of shells far more ugly than using hard-coded
> > paths.
>
> That's ok; I think we've done a decent job of narrowing the
> possibilities down, and I did miss that fifth possible resolution, so
> thanks.
>
> If you don't mind, I'll write up a description of both of our
> favorites, giving the pros and cons as I understand them, hopefully
> which we would both agree to, and then post it for the comments of
> others?
Good plan.
--
EARTH
smog | bricks
AIR -- mud -- FIRE
soda water | tequila
WATER
-- with thanks to fortune
Reply to: