Re: Conflicts between FHS and GnuStep
* Manoj Srivastava (email@example.com) [040823 23:55]:
> On Mon, 23 Aug 2004 20:30:43 +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar <firstname.lastname@example.org> said:
> > I agree, and since the difference between 1 and 2 is not relevant
> > for Sarge, I propose option '1.5':
> It is, since I do not think we should be special casing a
> policy excemption for these packages.
> >> Leave the GNUstep files as it is for Sarge, and discuss whether
> >> they need to be changed after Sarge is released
> > To be implemented by downgrading the relevant bug to important.
> "serious". It is still a policy violation.
Well, if we go to 1.5, the severity is a bit unsure. If we go to 1,
the severity is "closed", for 2, the severity is serious+sarge-ignore.
(But I don't care too much, I just want a clear direction to go to.)
PGP 1024/89FB5CE5 DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F 3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C