Bug#267142: debian-policy: Sections 10.4 and 6.1 are inconsistent (Posix doesn't say what you think it says)
Wouter Verhelst <wouter@grep.be> writes:
> On Fri, Aug 20, 2004 at 05:16:35PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> > By contrast, listing a bunch of shells directly means that policy
> > doesn't have to get into the nitty gritty--which can only be a good
> > thing!
>
> Sorry; but I find a list of shells far more ugly than using hard-coded
> paths.
That's ok; I think we've done a decent job of narrowing the
possibilities down, and I did miss that fifth possible resolution, so
thanks.
If you don't mind, I'll write up a description of both of our
favorites, giving the pros and cons as I understand them, hopefully
which we would both agree to, and then post it for the comments of
others?
Reply to: