Bug#218530: Summary of options for improving conditional rune for initscript calls

To: Andreas Metzler <ametzler@downhill.at.eu.org>
Cc: Ian Jackson <ian@davenant.greenend.org.uk>, 218530@bugs.debian.org, 218530-quiet@bugs.debian.org, 218530-submitter@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#218530: Summary of options for improving conditional rune for initscript calls
From: Thomas Hood <jdthood@aglu.demon.nl>
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2004 21:07:28 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 1088190447.974.928.camel@thanatos>
Reply-to: Thomas Hood <jdthood@aglu.demon.nl>, 218530@bugs.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20040625182935.GA2417@downhill.at.eu.org>
References: <[🔎] 1088094398.974.525.camel@thanatos> <[🔎] 16603.10019.903003.425994@davenant.relativity.greenend.org.uk> <[🔎] 20040625182935.GA2417@downhill.at.eu.org>

On Fri, 2004-06-25 at 20:29, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> FWIW posix suggests to use "command -v" if available,


In that case, should the fact that posh doesn't support it be
considered a bug?

--
Thomas Hood

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Bug#218530: Summary of options for improving conditional rune for initscript calls
  - From: Andreas Metzler <ametzler@downhill.at.eu.org>

References:
- Bug#218530: Summary of options for improving conditional rune for initscript calls
  - From: Thomas Hood <jdthood@aglu.demon.nl>
- Bug#218530: Summary of options for improving conditional rune for initscript calls
  - From: Ian Jackson <ian@davenant.greenend.org.uk>
- Bug#218530: Summary of options for improving conditional rune for initscript calls
  - From: Andreas Metzler <ametzler@downhill.at.eu.org>

Prev by Date: Bug#218530: Summary of options for improving conditional rune for initscript calls
Next by Date: Bug#218530: Summary of options for improving conditional rune for initscript calls
Previous by thread: Bug#218530: Summary of options for improving conditional rune for initscript calls
Next by thread: Bug#218530: Summary of options for improving conditional rune for initscript calls
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread