On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 11:46:20AM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote: > Hello, > I have recently asked Scott James Remnant[1] on IRC for comments on this > problem and the proposed solution (#229357), to add Build-Options: > build-arch' to debian/control if the package supported this target. I've been wondering... why bother? Why can't we just make build-arch and build-indep mandatory, and make stuff such as build-indep: build-stamp build-arch: build-stamp build: build-stamp build-stamp: [whatever is necessary] touch build-stamp legal if splitting out build-indep and/or build-arch is impossible or infeasible? That way, dpkg-buildpackage could assume that all three targets are available, and just run the build-arch, build-indep, or build targets, as necessary, without any risk for breakage. Of course, doing so will need a long and painful transition plan, but I think this would end us up with something not as kludgy as having to add a field somewhere that would advertise the availability of certain options. Comments? -- EARTH smog | bricks AIR -- mud -- FIRE soda water | tequila WATER -- with thanks to fortune
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature