On Thu, Apr 08, 2004 at 09:49:14AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > On Thu, Apr 08, 2004 at 12:28:20AM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > > Well, if one goes to think why currently some maintainers very much > > would like to use non-ASCII characters, it is because their name is > > spelled using a Latin alphabet (like English, Swedish, Polish, > > French), but the ASCII characterset has no support for diacretical marks > > on those characters, or even lacks the Latin character in their name. > > This makes their name visibly wierd, it's nearly correct, but some > > diacretical marks are missing. > > You have to define the x in ISO-8859-x, they are different in the > characters over 128. Where did I talk about ISO-8859-x? I didn't even mention that character set, it isn't in any way part of my proposal or part of my argumentation. Did you read my mail? --Jeroen -- Jeroen van Wolffelaar Jeroen@wolffelaar.nl (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944357) http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl
Attachment:
pgpY_mhDc_09E.pgp
Description: PGP signature