Re: rmail, m-t-a, and uucp

[Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>]

* Adrian Bunk (bunk@fs.tum.de) [040325 11:25]:
> On Thu, Mar 25, 2004 at 10:52:50AM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > I think it's definitly too late in the release process to force all
> > MTAs to add an additional virtual package.

> Why?
> 
> There is not even an announced date for the beginning of the freeze and 
> the changes required for the MTAs are pretty simple.

We have already enough RC-grade, simple bugs open, so that I
personally would like to not add more bugs to this list.

Of course, that's just my personal opinion, and I'm not a RM.


Cheers,
Andi
-- 
   http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
   PGP 1024/89FB5CE5  DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F  3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C