On Sun, Mar 14, 2004 at 11:21:59PM +0100, Jakob Bohm wrote: > However, I still see no in band mechanism in the packaging system > whereby aptitude or any other tool can determine if a package > priority is assigned to satisfy assertion [1] or because the > package in and of itself is considered a necessary part of the > functionality promised by that priority level. That should > affect the quality of any aptitude default settings of the M > flag. I do agree that this information should be encoded someplace. Anyone got any proposals? -- G. Branden Robinson | Religion consists in a set of Debian GNU/Linux | things which the average man thinks branden@debian.org | he believes and wishes he was http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | certain of. -- Mark Twain
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature