Bug#203145: (uploaders in control) Note: not in .deb
On Wed, 25 Feb 2004 00:39:49 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <email@example.com> said:
> On Fri, 20 Feb 2004, Bob Hilliard wrote:
>> Manoj Srivastava <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
>> > Why is this not sufficient? Why do we need a policy dictum
>> > about this? What problems would arise of there is not formal
>> > policy about this issue?
>> If a developer decides to formalize a co-maintainer for a package,
>> he will look in Policy for a description of the field. Is it
>> "Uploader:" or "Uploaders:"? May it include commas or other
>> punctuation? Having such information conveniently available in
>> Policy is preferable to searching the archives of -devel for that
Isn't this field only looked at by dinstall?
> That information is to be either found in policy or the developers'
Wrong. The documentation should be where it belongs -- along
with the rest of the documentation for our packaging system.
> reference. While it is bad enough to have information scattered and
> often duplicated in two documents, it is unacceptable to have to dig
> after it in the list archives.
> Now, if it is NOT in the developer's reference, it is time to add it
Even the developers reference is not, IMHO, the documentation
for our packaging system. Wed need a manual for our packaging system
-- one that is policy aware, so one need not look into multiple
places for things.
"The final twitch of "Political Correctness" grand peur has to do with
the age-old fear of antinomian beastliness, lesbians holding black
masses over copies of Derrida and so forth." Alexander Cockburn
Manoj Srivastava <email@example.com> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C