Re: Bug#172436: this proposal
On Tue, 24 Feb 2004 16:10:15 +0100, Bill Allombert <allomber@math.u-bordeaux.fr> said:
> In my experience, the developers reference is not suitable for best
> practice about packages. I don't claim Debian policy is suitable for
> best practice, either.
> One of the reason is that developers reference is not linked to a
> mailing list and lack a formal discussion process, so best practices
> tend to be discussed in debian-policy.
In the past, editors of the developers reference have followed
the discussion here on policy, and, in any case, can always be CC'd
any consensus reached here for includion into the developers
reference. I think we do not need the solution you propose; since in
practice the problem is not as sever as you imply.
manoj
--
Make the most of the day, by determining to spend it on two sort of
acquaintances only--those by whom something may be got, and those from
whom something may be learned. -- Colton
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
Reply to: