On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 02:03:17PM -0600, Adam Heath wrote: > Instead of Rules-Version: in control, which specifies a single interface > 'number', how about a Rules-Interface:, which contains a series of flags, > specifying what features are supported? > > I leave it up to this list to decide what flags and what features get > enabled/disabled. On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 01:03:48PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > I think we should attach versioning to the entire layout of the unpacked > source package. > > This gives us the flexibility to make other kinds of changes without > cluttering debian/ with still more files. > > Consider a file debian/format: > > $ cat debian/format > rules: 1 > control: 2 [...] So, why not a mix of these two? why don't we attach the concept of interface to the entire source package? debian/interface could be a file in which we describe the interface implemented by each component (object) of the source package. $ cat debian/interface rules: <rules-interface1>, <rules-interface2>, ... control: <control-interface1>, <control-interface1>, ... ... ciao, -- Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis | Elegant or ugly code as well aliases: Luca ^De [A-Z][A-Za-z\-]*[iy]'\?s$ | as fine or rude sentences have Luca, a wannabe ``Good guy''. | something in common: they local LANG="it_IT@euro" | don't depend on the language.
Attachment:
pgpS4Xcwxaw94.pgp
Description: PGP signature