Re: Bug#176506: Proposal seconded...though very late..:-)

To: Andreas Metzler <ametzler@downhill.at.eu.org>, debian-policy@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#176506: Proposal seconded...though very late..:-)
From: Mark Baker <mark@mnb.org.uk>
Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2003 11:13:28 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 3F1130C8.1020407@mnb.org.uk>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20030712130012.GA10605@downhill.at.eu.org>
References: <[🔎] 1057860072.12722.3.camel@rock.grep.be> <[🔎] 3F0DCBE0.6050000@mnb.org.uk> <[🔎] 20030712042550.GB10635@dragon.kitenet.net> <[🔎] 20030712130012.GA10605@downhill.at.eu.org>

Andreas Metzler wrote:

I have not doublechecked packages.d.o. but the package's control file
lists exim4, exim4-config, exim4-base and exim4-daemon-light as
Priority: important and I cannot remember getting a mail about
override disparities.

I need to do another exim package soon anyway, to fix a few minor bugs.I will change its priority. I guess extra is appropriate?

Reply to:

References:
- Bug#176506: Proposal seconded...though very late..:-)
  - From: Wouter Verhelst <wouter@grep.be>
- Re: Bug#176506: Proposal seconded...though very late..:-)
  - From: Mark Baker <mark@mnb.org.uk>
- Re: Bug#176506: Proposal seconded...though very late..:-)
  - From: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>
- Re: Bug#176506: Proposal seconded...though very late..:-)
  - From: Andreas Metzler <ametzler@downhill.at.eu.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Deconf and shared questions
Next by Date: Bug#201182: debian-policy: /etc/init.d scripts mask failure
Previous by thread: Re: Bug#176506: Proposal seconded...though very late..:-)
Next by thread: Bug#176506: Proposal seconded...though very late..:-)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread