Re: menu-policy update process
- To: debian-policy@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: menu-policy update process
- From: Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org>
- Date: Sat, 07 Jun 2003 11:44:02 -0500
- Message-id: <[🔎] 87el25et2l.fsf@glaurung.green-gryphon.com>
- In-reply-to: <20030528183740.GA9043@starless.xtnet> (Chris Waters's message of "Wed, 28 May 2003 11:37:40 -0700")
- References: <20030528005558.GA15506@dragon.kitenet.net> <20030528093415.GA7600@starless.xtnet> <20030528161722.GG5627@dragon.kitenet.net> <20030528183740.GA9043@starless.xtnet>
On Wed, 28 May 2003 11:37:40 -0700, Chris Waters <xtifr@debian.org> said:
> On Wed, May 28, 2003 at 12:17:22PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
>> I personally think that these types of things are better handled by
>> having one person who just comes up with something logical and
>> consistant.
> I agree if and only if you can find the right person. Any
> volunteers?...
> Actually, what the heck, my name is at the top of the authors list.
> And even though I think it's alphabetical by first name, I'm willing
> to use that as an excuse to volunteer as menu-policy dictator.
> (Mwuah-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha!!)
Fine by me. Are you going to advertize this somehow? Perhaps
have a menupolicy@d.o alias set up that can then be referenced in the
policy itself to direct people to send requests to that address, to
be vetted before being included in policy?
manoj
--
QOTD: "I haven't come far enough, and don't call me baby."
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
Reply to: