Bug#178809: rules for Build-Depends-Indep satisfaction make no sense
On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 12:23:50AM -0600, Adam Heath wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, Julian Gilbey wrote:
>
> > So given how few packages we are talking about, would it be worth the
> > buildds using all packages specified in both Build-Depends and
> > Build-Depends-Indep and phasing out Build-Depends-Indep?
>
> I modified apt's build earlier this week to work in split mode. I'll also be
> making certain dpkg does as well. Please don't phase it out.
Great! What do you mean by "split mode", though, and does this mean
that we must have something like "debian/rules -q build-arch"
returning a meaningful value?
Julian
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Julian Gilbey, website: http://www.polya.uklinux.net/
Debian GNU/Linux Developer, see: http://people.debian.org/~jdg/
Visit http://www.thehungersite.com/ to help feed the hungry
Reply to: