[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Question regarding policy (11.2)



On Thu, 6 Feb 2003 11:50:16 +0100,
Josip Rodin <joy@gkvk.hr> wrote:
> 	  The static version of a library must be compiled without the
> 	  <tt>-fPIC</tt> option. It must be placed in the development
> 	  package, normally <package>lib*-dev</package>, but if its size
> 	  exceeds the size of the rest of the files in the development
> 	  package, it can be placed in a separate package called
> 	  <package>lib*-static-dev</package>. It is recommended that the
> 	  <package>lib*-dev</package> packages then declare a
> 	  <tt>Suggests</tt> or <tt>Recommends</tt> relationship to their
> 	  respective <package>lib*-static-dev</package> package.
Why not
lib*: shared library, all symlinks to .so (including .so -> .so.x.y.z)
      and header files
lib*-dev: static library?

-- 
Oohara Yuuma <oohara@libra.interq.or.jp>
Debian developer
PGP key (key ID F464A695) http://www.interq.or.jp/libra/oohara/pub-key.txt
Key fingerprint = 6142 8D07 9C5B 159B C170  1F4A 40D6 F42E F464 A695

Is it necessary to show the whole world how harsh one can be?
--- Martin Loschwitz



Reply to: