Re: Bug#220779: ITP: zope-epoz -- Cross-browser-wysiwyg-editor for Zope
Chris Waters dijo [Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 02:46:22PM -0800]:
> But I still think that the vast majority of us would
> disagree with a claim that a package homepage URL is merely
> "administrivia" in any case.
>
> Now, I suppose it could be argued that if a home page for a package
> doesn't contain any useful information about that package (unlikely
> but possible), then the URL *would* qualify as "adminstrivia", but I
> think you'd have to show that the home page is useless before making
> such a claim, and such arguments would have to be done on a
> package-by-package basis.
Unlikely but possible? That's how most of my package's homepages are
like - An entry in CPAN, no more and no less. It is of absolutely no
use for the casual user who wants to install the package. It is only
useful when you want to download the sources and install it by
yourself, maybe after some modifications - and that renders the
package useless.
Greetings,
--
Gunnar Wolf - gwolf@gwolf.cx - (+52-55)5630-9700 ext. 1366
PGP key 1024D/8BB527AF 2001-10-23
Fingerprint: 0C79 D2D1 2C4E 9CE4 5973 F800 D80E F35A 8BB5 27AF
Reply to: